A cornerstone is usually the first stone laid in the construction of a building.It is essential and indispensable since it unites the walls of a building at an intersection. Leadership is based on relationships and a key building block in any relationship is the cornerstone of trust. I teach a leadership course based on the Mission Command leadership philosophy.
Here is what Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP) 6-0 Mission Command says about trust:
“Trust must flow throughout the chain of command. To function effectively, commanders must trust their subordinates, and subordinates must trust their commanders.”
Mission Command includes the following principals :
-Build Cohesive Teams through Mutual trust.
-Create shared understanding
-Provide a clear Commander's intent
-Exercise Disciplined Initiative
-Use mission orders
-Accept prudent risk
Trust is the cornerstone of Mission Command. It is the responsibility of leaders to earn trust through the building of relationships. There is a reason “ Build Cohesive Teams through Mutual trust” is at the top of the list. The mission command philosophy emphasizes the decentralization of decision authority. This requires “Mutual Trust” and if there is no trust then leaders will centralize decision authority and not empower subordinates.
Leader development is a continuous process and leaders should be developed into lifelong learners. For leaders to practice the principals of mission command they need to be educated and trained. My class just finished a study of Mission Command.
|Cadets discussing Mission Command in class|
-“My main takeaways from mission command involve the connection between mutual trust and providing clear intent. I think the ability to be as transparent as possible in leadership and to communicate clear intent to subordinates builds that mutual trust in a relationship. Additionally, exercising disciplined initiative shows understanding and ability and adds to mutual trust between a leader and subordinate. I think i learned that clear intent/communication and disciplined initiative/confidence are the main building blocks in mutual trust which is absolutely essential for maximum effectiveness in a relationship as well as a unit.”
-“My takeaways from the mission command block can all fall into the personal relationship between commanders and subordinates. Every principle of mission command provides a different aspect of accomplishing a mission that requires the commander and subordinate to understand each other. At the bottom line, if a commander can understand how the subordinate thinks and generally agrees with the thought process, mission command will succeed. For example, the commander will trust the leader to execute orders while taking prudent risks. Vice versa, if the subordinate leader can understand the commander's perspective, the leader will fulfill the commanders intent with disciplined initiative in a confident manner that will allow full follow through and mission completion. If a subordinate and a commander cannot see the others point of view or has no understanding of how the other thinks, the relationship will quickly degrade and instead of commanders intent being handed down, an exact list of details to complete will be handed down causing more work for the commander and leaving little opportunity for the subordinate leader to accomplish anything of great worth. The relationship is very personal and every action leads to or breaks trust that is the basis of success and failure in a mission command environment.”
-“Main takeaways from mission command:At the outset of this block I truthfully had no understanding of mission command. To try to tease out its meaning, I broke the phrase down into its two, separate parts; mission and command. Looking at this now, I made a grave error. Mission command cannot be broken apart. They are bound and move together.
So what, then, is mission command? At the surface level mission command is leadership. In order to be an effective mission commander you have to be a leader. In being a good leader you build an environment which nourishes the quantities of mission command: unit cohesion through trust, shared understanding, clear intent, exercise developed initiative, use of mission orders, and accepting prudent risk. While these concepts may seem abstract at first, they are things we naturally acknowledge. The mission command paradigm simply redirects our focus to the qualities which are most important.
The development of my understanding mission command over the past few weeks has made me more aware of the expectations of the Army. Thankfully many of her demands are being fostered here at the Academy. Despite the attention the Academy dedicates to these areas, we as future officers can always improve. Dedicating myself to these principles (in reality just outlining good leadership qualities) will allow me to improve unit effectiveness and ability regardless of level. This enables a more efficient method accomplishing the mission -- the overall goal of mission command.”
I don't know what types of leaders these cadets will become, but hopefully I've been able to provide them with an understanding that the most important building block in any relationship is the cornerstone of trust.
Jonathan Silk is a Major in the U.S. Army. He has served as a Cavalry Scout platoon leader , and has commanded both a Tank Company and an Infantry Company. He is currently an Academic Instructor and serving as the Operations Officer for the Center for the Advancement of Leader Development andOrganizational Learning (CALDOL) at the United States Army Military Academy, West Point, NY. He was a recipient of the calendar year 2009 General Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award.